The Common Prior Assumption in Economic Theory
Abstract
Why is (it that) common priors are implicit or explicit in the vast majority of the differential information literature in economics and game theory? Why has the economic community been unwilling, in practice, to accept and actually use the idea of truly personal probabilities in much the same way that it did accept the idea of personal utility functions? After all, in (Savage's expected utility theory), both the utilities and probabilities are derived separately for each decision maker. Why were the utilities accepted as personal, and the probabilities not?
Journal: Economics and Philosophy
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Citations are the number of DOI-registered works in Crossref that cite this paper; references are how many works it cites. Full text is on the publisher site via the DOI link.