In Defense of Proper Functions

Ruth Garrett Millikan

1989Published
594Citations
0References
journal articleType

Abstract

I defend the historical definition of “function” originally given in my Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories (1984a). The definition was not offered in the spirit of conceptual analysis but is more akin to a theoretical definition of “function”. A major theme is that nonhistorical analyses of “function” fail to deal adequately with items that are not capable of performing their functions.

Journal: Philosophy of Science

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Citations are the number of DOI-registered works in Crossref that cite this paper; references are how many works it cites. Full text is on the publisher site via the DOI link.